Reality?
Is there such a thing in the Age of Untruth? Authenticity in
Narration
It’s
all just stories - none of us knows the truth about anything. But stories are
good. They are what we tell ourselves to keep fear at bay, to make sense of our
lives, to see things as we want to see them so everything is skewed really. - Stephen Mangan The Times March 5th 2016.
“There’s
always a story. It’s all stories
really. The sun coming up every day is a
story. Everything’s got a story in it. Change the story, change the world.” - Terry
Pratchett – A Hat Full of Sky.
Do you sometimes feel that you’ve turned up in
life just after the cop cars and the ambulances and the fire engines have just
disappeared round the corner, the smashed glass has been swept away and there is
nothing left to see? How much of life is lived just out of sight, just round
the corner? It sometimes feels to me as
though I’m listening to the world through cotton wool, touching it with boxing
gloves. All I perceive is the shallow
and shaky and occasional fleeting moments of experience instead of those big,
defining events that everyone else seems to enjoy.
I
guess that’s partly my fault. My young
friend Skidmore would sneer at me on his way to the casino or a day out bungee
jumping and say “You live your life
second hand. What do you expect? You only
see the world through Facebook and Twitter, through mediated and filtered web
sites. If you’ve got a problem with the
world, it’s your fault. You live in a bubble of shared opinion. You only see
the world through a tiny knothole of the rotting woodwork of your front door.”
And yes, all
sadly true, Skidders, Old Man. As a
writer I need to indulge in the reality of the world around and to provide an all-embracing
experience for my audiences. I want to
record and comment on what it is like to be human. I do it, not by an exact reproduction of the
world around, a one to one scale model, but by observing and adapting what I
see so that others may see my vision. To
agree or disagree as they see fit. But
at all events I must understand and report with veracity. What I need is for my audience to trust me,
to believe in the world, the ideas I put before them that they are willing to
accompany me on my journey and not keep noticing the hollows and blank spaces I
have been unable to fill. Where can I find the authentic, real and plausible in
this world of the fakery and sham?
What is truth? said
jesting Pilate; and would not stay for an answer – Francis Bacon
“Anyway, we
don’t do Truth anymore. Truth is so…
last year.” says Skidmore warming in his
opinion.
“What in God’s
name “do you even mean when you ramble
on about authenticity and vomit up words like “reality” or “plausibility”? “Veracity?”
You make up stories. You’re a
professional liar. What on earth do you
know about truth? What right do you have
to criticise other people for not telling the Truth?”
Good point. I’m
not a journalist. I’m not out to record the
details of car crashes or bank robberies.
Not the events themselves at any rate but I do believe I’m trying to
capture an authentic human response to what’s going on in the world.
I am, as I might
have said to Skidmore if he’s hung around to listen, an observer. Even if I
miss the car crash, somehow, I’ve got to observe the way people react to this sort
of event. I’ve got to sniff the air and see which way humanity is heading. And having got some sense of what’s going on
I’ve then got to try to interpret and construct a narrative. Not necessarily
about the big events and occurrences but about the little details, the way
people react, how they change.
I realise that
as an artist, and more particularly as a playwright, I’m wrestling with two
sorts of authenticity. The authenticity
of my response to the world around. In
other words, trying to relay what I see with minimum bullshit. But I’m also faced with the task of providing
an emotionally satisfying and gripping first-hand experience for my audiences
that will draw them in and cause them to be engaged in the way that I am.
Before I
write poetry or fiction I need to
understand what truth is.
“They’re all liars, cheats and fakes” says Skidmore. “I wouldn’t vote for any of them” An all too familiar line and largely
accurate. What is worrying, moreover is
that these rogues and charlatans have learnt how to manipulate the press and
social media and have discovered that lying and cheating is just as efficacious
at moving opinion as a reasoned argument used to be. But by abjuring from voting Skidmore has let
the liars and cheats off the hook. There
is no possibility of the world being any different. Not all politicians are self-serving and
mendacious, but those who are will always have louder voices than those who are
not. So, why is it when we
seek out people of authenticity to be our representatives in government, do we
almost always end up with the self-regarding, bullies, liars and cheats?
The culture of celebrity on television, the celebration
of mountebanks by news media provide an ecology in which everyone is fake because
we expect nothing else. We have lost trust in politicians and people in
authority and thereby we have lost trust in humanity as a whole. People
who appear to be decent enough chaps in the pub we find are working for
multinational companies and banking corporations. They defend what they have to do by saying
“We are forced into a course of action by our shareholders. We are legally obliged to consider the
interests of our investors first.” Those
at the bar have an uneasy feeling that this equates to “I was only following
orders.” And we all know where that led.
Not only are we uncomfortable with this, it seems to require a form of
doublethink way beyond mere hypocrisy.
Can we ever accept a pint from someone like this or trust them to drive our
kids to school?
Can I as a playwright do anything to
reverse that? How can I show a more
authentic view of humanity that would contribute in some small way to restoring
everyone’s faith in the essential goodness of human nature without compromising
the truth that people are, indeed, venal, grasping, selfish, prone to violence,
self-centred and so on and so forth?
We give out medals for a single act of
physical prowess. How do we reward a
lifetime of caring?
"Everything
is relative. Stories are being made up all the time - there is no such thing as
the truth. You can see how that has filtered its way indirectly into
post-truth." A.C. Grayling
At
the same time, this yearning for authentic experience drives the apparent
hunger for thrill laden activities and dangerous sports. I’m convinced that’s one of the reasons that
Skidmore spends so much of his time in casinos and bars. Or dangling by his
feet from an elastic band over a waterfall. Our quotidian existence is so far
from feeling any sort of natural engagement with the world that we must seek
out experiences that are near to death. Or bankruptcy. We seek the outlandish,
the dangerous, the bitter. But our
search for the authentic experience forces us closer and closer to the
inauthentic. We yearn to hike through
authentic countryside, we long to eat authentic Mexican food. And yet, the closer we get to them the less
authentic the experience. In reality the
countryside is cold wet and muddy and entirely mundane. It is a working
environment for those who live there and residents experience all sorts of
discomforts and disadvantages such as non-existent public transport, thirty
miles drives to the local hospital, intermittent phone and broadband and
village shops, schools and pubs that close down leaving ghost communities. The countryside is, frankly, tedious. It is
no more than a factory floor with bushes. We do not want the authentic
countryside, we want convenient car parks and defined footpaths with the
brambles trimmed back. We need easy
access to viewpoints where we can look at the scenery for a few moments and let
the dogs run after the sheep before driving back down to the authentic village
pub run by a chain from London where we can order Authentic Chipotle straight
from the freezer and microwave. We settle for a facsimile of the
authentic.
But
there is a dissatisfaction in this clearly hollow view of the world. It has permeated the whole of 21st
century existence. And the more we are squeezed economically and socially, the
more we demand to satisfy this emptiness.
Those who live their lives
in extremis, who feel crushed by poverty or by a world they no longer feel part
of, will lash out. They will follow any
narrative that offers them a glimmer of hope.
That narrative may be entirely fictitious., It may be a fantasy offering a pot of fairy
gold at the end of a rainbow, but for those who have nothing it is everything.
An
authentic experience is one validated by our senses. Touch, taste, smell, hearing, sight. The more senses that are involved the more
authentic an experience becomes. It can be brought into even sharper focus by
having others experience it with us.
“Did you see that?” we ask and are happy is someone else witnessed it at
the same time as we did. Afterwards, we construct
a narrative around the event so that it becomes a reality. It could be an
hilarious dinner table story or a heart-stopping drama. We encompass it and draw delight from the
fact that we experienced something truthful at last. But it still doesn’t mean
that an experience is true. Truth, as we
are constantly urged to believe, is conditional on context and frames of
reference. It may be possible to say
that the authentic experience occurs within space – the here and now while the
narrative about it occurs within and over time.
We stand on a clifftop and feel the wind in our face and hear the waves
crashing below and smell and taste the salt on the air. It is the punch in the face, the kick on the
shins. This is a moment of
experience. We need to be absolutely involved
in the moment for it to be more than something fleeting and ephemeral. It
requires total engagement. And later, the contemplation of that event, the
story of that moment, becomes the narrative truth. We sit in front of a roaring fire and recall
that cold, the rain trickling down the back of our necks. We may laugh about it whatever the shock and
discomfort we felt at the time.
But
not everyone has the time or the conditioning to go and stand on a clifftop
gazing at the ocean waiting for some epiphany of the soul. And not everyone has the capacity to capture
that moment in a form that can be transmitted to others. Sometimes we need an
intermediary, a playwright or other artist for instance, to draw our attention
to that experience and give us a reason for paying it attention. If we artists and writers do our job properly
we can weave a narrative that carries the audience through the emotional
landscape and gives a more accurate, fuller picture of humanity. Fiction or not.
It’s important to be able to
understand both the ideas of authenticity of world view and authenticity of
experience in order for the playwright to construct a narrative by drawing
these two ways of experiencing a moment or an event together.
Having
observed the world and its people the playwright can construct a narrative
bringing together elements that would never meet in real life. Their prime function is to ask the question
“What if…?” of the world and the people they observe. “What if Donald Trump did meet Nelson Mandela?”
“What is time travel is possible and we could go back to the beginning of
2016?” The writer then applies their
Imagination. The creative narrator
imagines themselves inside the mind of their character. She gives it life and credibility and tries
to examine what the possible outcome of the question is. The writer inhabits the multiverse where all
outcomes are possible, providing that we apply the rules of humanity and human
nature.
John
Le Carre, the eminent spy novelist makes a subtle distinction between
“authenticity” and “plausibility” meaning, I believe, that merely to present
our reality is not enough for a writer.
The world we create may be as far removed from the world we see through
our window as we like; what is crucial is that we create a world that is so
dense and thought out that the reader or audience never needs to question its
veracity. In just such a way that the
work of great scenic designers and directors go unrecognised because they
create an all-encompassing world on the
stage of such breadth that we never see round it. By creating such a total
world and guiding our audiences through it, we are providing a totally
immersive, authentic experience where we can explore issues and ideas that
might sit uneasily with our own small experience but which in some way we can
describe as True.
Music
doesn’t have to be beautiful all the time.
It has to be True. It has to have meaning. It has to articulate
something that’s important to be said. -
Natalie Clein Cellist. BBC Front Row January 12th 2017